>>23231 the second move is very unintuitive.
>>23236 White: mate in 3 via bishop c4
actual game: White initiated a mate in 4 via rook d8
not every day I do better than the 19th century masters...
>>23239 starts as a mate in 11
Black: rook x g3, start of mate in 11
White: f4 x e5, check
Black: rook x rook, mate in 10
White: bishop h6, check
Black: queen x bishop, mate in 9
White: knight d2
Black: queen x knight, mate in 8
and then I went for a queen trade and got off the line, after a -2 to +9 material swing
actual game: White blundered rook X rook on his first move, making a mate in 11 into a mate in 3.
>>23364Black: rook h5, check
White: bishop x rook
Black: g5, checkmate
actual game: White surrendered after rook h5
>>23392Black: knight x bishop. theoretical mate in 9
White: queen x rook
Black: queen x queen. mi7
White: pawn x knight
Black: c3. mi6
White: rook c4
Black: queen b3. mi5
White: rook h2
Black: pawn x b2, check. mi4
White: king b1
Black: pawn x rook, queen promotion, check. mi4
White: king x queen
and then chased down the king
actual game: mate in 4 via rook x a3.
I missed the 3rd move and thus didn't choose that line.